ELT's new

A Place to Share Experiences and Discuss Aviation Stories
Forum rules
You must be a member of the Cessna 120-140 Association in order to post new topics, reply to existing topics, or search for information on this forum. Use the "Join" link in the red menu bar.
V529
Posts: 697
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 7:00 am
Name: Victor G
Location: Michigan
Aircraft Type: C-120
Occupation-Interests: Work on airplanes till the cows come home..........they're still out.
Contact:

Re: ELT's new

Post by V529 »

8126 wrote: Tue Mar 17, 2026 7:28 am "Finding Carla" is a book about how the requirement for ELT's came about. Interesting reading and somewhat puts lie to the oft repeated tale that ELTs never saved anyone. I have three different model ELTs and the batteries, ranging from AA's to D cells, all cost with $5 of each other and have tripled in cost over three replacement cycles. The EBC-102 is Duracell AA's, the Sharc 7 is D cells wired together though not epoxied and the BP-1010 batteries are D cells epoxied in a plastic box. The new 406 ELT batteries are twice as expensive generally and have a longer life limit that puts the cost per year still about the same from what I've seen so far.
Never heard of "Finding Carla". I'll check it out. I've talked to CAP pilots and they have conflicting reports. We all have a story........some good.........some not good.
User avatar
6843
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 7:00 am
Name: Dave Sirota
Location: Tucson
Aircraft Type: C-140
Occupation-Interests:
Contact:

Re: ELT's new

Post by 6843 »

I still use a 121.5 ELT. I spoke at length with a NOAA rep at OSH a few years ago. His take was keep the 121.5 (mine is standard D batteries), carry a PLB, and have ADSB out. As I understand it, the first place Search & Rescue looks is the ADSB info.
Dave Sirota
'46 C-140 N89654
'67 C-182 N2626R
Formally had '96 Hatz N24B
KRYN
Post Reply