Fuel Economy
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2019 10:53 am
Hi Folks,
I'm new to the forum, and really happy to have all the information available here.
I just purchased a 140 in Quebec and flew it home to BC. It was a great adventure, especially since I hadn't flown a 140 before and I only had 10 hours in a Luscombe for taildragger experience. I am very happy with the plane, it cruises nice and lands easily. I am looking forward to adding a few things to improve it now that it's home.
Along the way I kept track of hours, miles and fuel consumption. I thought someone might be curious just how economical the 140's are. I should mention it has the C90, a 52 inch pitch prop and it was loaded to 1350lbs most of the way. I broke the data into Canadian and American units for ease of comparison with vehicle fuel economy. The short story is: 24 hours of flying covering 2083 Statute Miles using 114.5 gallons of 100LL. The averages are 4.8 gal/hr 18.3 mi/gal. I looked up vehicle fuel economies and found the worst, a Toyota Tundra 4x4 would have been cheaper and more efficient. The long story below:
**Note** Cost/hour and mile are in Canadian loonies.
I'm new to the forum, and really happy to have all the information available here.
I just purchased a 140 in Quebec and flew it home to BC. It was a great adventure, especially since I hadn't flown a 140 before and I only had 10 hours in a Luscombe for taildragger experience. I am very happy with the plane, it cruises nice and lands easily. I am looking forward to adding a few things to improve it now that it's home.
Along the way I kept track of hours, miles and fuel consumption. I thought someone might be curious just how economical the 140's are. I should mention it has the C90, a 52 inch pitch prop and it was loaded to 1350lbs most of the way. I broke the data into Canadian and American units for ease of comparison with vehicle fuel economy. The short story is: 24 hours of flying covering 2083 Statute Miles using 114.5 gallons of 100LL. The averages are 4.8 gal/hr 18.3 mi/gal. I looked up vehicle fuel economies and found the worst, a Toyota Tundra 4x4 would have been cheaper and more efficient. The long story below:
**Note** Cost/hour and mile are in Canadian loonies.