How much will that affect the altimeter?
Airpeed appears to be way off
Forum rules
You must be a member of the Cessna 120-140 Association in order to post new topics, reply to existing topics, or search for information on this forum. Use the "Join" link in the red menu bar.
You must be a member of the Cessna 120-140 Association in order to post new topics, reply to existing topics, or search for information on this forum. Use the "Join" link in the red menu bar.
-
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Fri May 17, 2019 12:11 am
- Name: Thayne I
- Location: N87
- Aircraft Type: C-140
- Occupation-Interests: Retired Airline Pilot
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2019 12:08 pm
- Name: Blaine F
- Location: Saskatchewan
- Aircraft Type: C140A
- Occupation-Interests: Helicopter Pilot
- Contact:
Re: Airpeed appears to be way off
not enough to worry about unless you are doing an ILS to mins data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25bd0/25bd0ed35de0b23b4d00f2a671d07ac83efbbe7e" alt="Laughing :lol:"
Seriously, I disconnected all instruments from the static port, removed all the static lines and fittings and there is no issue. I my opinion in these small VFR only airplanes it probably safer that way. If the static port gets blocked for some reason and you take off you will have none of your instruments reading correctly.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25bd0/25bd0ed35de0b23b4d00f2a671d07ac83efbbe7e" alt="Laughing :lol:"
Seriously, I disconnected all instruments from the static port, removed all the static lines and fittings and there is no issue. I my opinion in these small VFR only airplanes it probably safer that way. If the static port gets blocked for some reason and you take off you will have none of your instruments reading correctly.
- 6643
- Posts: 2490
- Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 7:00 am
- Name: John C
- Location: KLCI, NH
- Aircraft Type: 1946 C140/C90
- Occupation-Interests: A&P, semi-retired
- Contact:
Re: Airpeed appears to be way off
Yeah, I got ice in the static port once. It was very confusing...
John Cooper
www.skyportservices.net
www.skyportservices.net
-
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Fri May 17, 2019 12:11 am
- Name: Thayne I
- Location: N87
- Aircraft Type: C-140
- Occupation-Interests: Retired Airline Pilot
- Contact:
Re: Airpeed appears to be way off
I agree with you. The altimeter will be slightly higher, increase the airspeed and doesn't affect the VSI at all. As for the static port being plugged, the instruments will be screwed up. Thank you for your help.8474 wrote: ↑Fri May 29, 2020 5:14 pm not enough to worry about unless you are doing an ILS to mins
Seriously, I disconnected all instruments from the static port, removed all the static lines and fittings and there is no issue. I my opinion in these small VFR only airplanes it probably safer that way. If the static port gets blocked for some reason and you take off you will have none of your instruments reading correctly.
Thayne
Happy flying. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3842b/3842bd27966c779155d24af8a9c4e00e512b781c" alt="Very Happy :D"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3842b/3842bd27966c779155d24af8a9c4e00e512b781c" alt="Very Happy :D"
- 6643
- Posts: 2490
- Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 7:00 am
- Name: John C
- Location: KLCI, NH
- Aircraft Type: 1946 C140/C90
- Occupation-Interests: A&P, semi-retired
- Contact:
Re: Airpeed appears to be way off
If the static is making the airspeed be off, don't you think it's doing the same for the altimeter?
John Cooper
www.skyportservices.net
www.skyportservices.net
-
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Fri May 17, 2019 12:11 am
- Name: Thayne I
- Location: N87
- Aircraft Type: C-140
- Occupation-Interests: Retired Airline Pilot
- Contact:
Re: Airpeed appears to be way off
I disconnected the line just inside from the static port. I flew today and it works..The airspeed is about 12 MPH faster and the stalling the plane coincides with the published speeds. The altimeter works better too..it was bouncy but now it's not and the VSI is slow in responding but not bouncy either as it was before. Thanks everyone for your help.8474 wrote: ↑Fri May 29, 2020 5:14 pm not enough to worry about unless you are doing an ILS to mins
Seriously, I disconnected all instruments from the static port, removed all the static lines and fittings and there is no issue. I my opinion in these small VFR only airplanes it probably safer that way. If the static port gets blocked for some reason and you take off you will have none of your instruments reading correctly.
Thayne
Happy flying. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3842b/3842bd27966c779155d24af8a9c4e00e512b781c" alt="Very Happy :D"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3842b/3842bd27966c779155d24af8a9c4e00e512b781c" alt="Very Happy :D"
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2022 8:24 pm
- Name: BFF
- Location: KDVN
- Aircraft Type: C140
- Occupation-Interests:
- Contact:
Re: Airpeed appears to be way off
8466-
Did you go through with the static line procedure? I just picked up a 46 140 and it exhibits the same anomalies. Airspeed 90mph (even with 0235) VSI 500 descent. - I agree that 65-70 ‘feels’ crazy fast
BFF (89855)
Did you go through with the static line procedure? I just picked up a 46 140 and it exhibits the same anomalies. Airspeed 90mph (even with 0235) VSI 500 descent. - I agree that 65-70 ‘feels’ crazy fast
BFF (89855)