Oil?

Ask Questions and Offer Advice Related to the Cessna 120 & 140 Type
Forum rules
You must be a member of the Cessna 120-140 Association in order to post new topics, reply to existing topics, or search for information on this forum. Use the "Join" link in the red menu bar.
6555
Posts: 24
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 7:32 pm
Name: John Shahkey
Aircraft Type: c140
Occupation-Interests:
Contact:

Oil?

Post by 6555 »

Hi Guys (and Gals):

I have been using Exxon Elite in my (hi time) C 90. They don't make it anymore, and Ive used my last Qt. Been thinking of going to P66 20W50, any thoughts? .....Thanks.........John Sharkey
User avatar
8233
Posts: 276
Joined: Wed May 02, 2018 6:52 pm
Name: David Freeland
Location: Kansas City
Aircraft Type: 1946 C120
Occupation-Interests: Program Management
Contact:

Re: Oil?

Post by 8233 »

I know a lot of people who use the Philips XC 20W50. Have heard 99% positive feedback. I knew one IA that took care of a university fleet that felt the Philips seemed to show more water in the oil during the winter months compared to others. I have zero idea why that would be. On the surface, that sounds more like the engines were not getting warm enough to allow for evaporation of water due to condensation.

I use straight weight Aeroshell W80 with Camguard on mine but if I was going to use a multiviscosity, it would be the Philips.
David Freeland - CFII
1972 Bellanca Super Viking and 1946 Cessna 120
2356
Posts: 143
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 7:00 am
Name: Huey Pilot
Location: Gainesville, TX
Aircraft Type: 140
Occupation-Interests: Retired
Contact:

Re: Oil?

Post by 2356 »

I use the Phillips X/C and Camguard. Very satisfied.
6930
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 7:00 am
Name: Mike
Location: Illinois
Aircraft Type: C140
Occupation-Interests:
Contact:

Re: Oil?

Post by 6930 »

Another X/C 20-50 with Camguard believer. Over 1,000 hrs since my overhaul, 76-80 cold at my last annual, 21 hours per quart oil burn rate. I used a new mechanic this last annual and he couldn’t believe the numbers for a 1,000 hour small bore Continental.

10 years of oil analysis history with nearly perfect numbers every time....consistent test to test. No metal from cut filters (even with pleats swiped with magnet). I change the oil every 25 hrs to get the lead out.

I fly pretty much every week though the last two years my plane was stored for 4 months per year when we go to Florida (properly prepared for storage).

Mike
8342
Posts: 293
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2018 11:55 pm
Name: Rick F
Location: KUSE Wauseon OH
Aircraft Type: C-140 (sold)
Occupation-Interests: Captain B-777 (Retired)
Contact:

Re: Oil?

Post by 8342 »

Phillips now has a 20W-50 oil with the Camguard already mixed in. It is called Victory oil.
I am a co owner in a Cherokee 180 and we switched to the Victory oil last year.
It saves measuring the Camguard every time.
The FBO I worked at years ago use the Phillips XC oil for years and never had any issues so I feel confident in using this new oil.

Rick
User avatar
8233
Posts: 276
Joined: Wed May 02, 2018 6:52 pm
Name: David Freeland
Location: Kansas City
Aircraft Type: 1946 C120
Occupation-Interests: Program Management
Contact:

Re: Oil?

Post by 8233 »

8342 wrote: Fri Dec 18, 2020 5:54 am Phillips now has a 20W-50 oil with the Camguard already mixed in. It is called Victory oil.
I am a co owner in a Cherokee 180 and we switched to the Victory oil last year.
It saves measuring the Camguard every time.
The FBO I worked at years ago use the Phillips XC oil for years and never had any issues so I feel confident in using this new oil.

Rick
Actually, it is not Camguard but they are mixing in Lycoming LW-16702 additive. Different formulation but similar idea. Mike Busch has written quite a bit about the various options and explains them but I believe he still favors Camguard.
David Freeland - CFII
1972 Bellanca Super Viking and 1946 Cessna 120
6930
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 7:00 am
Name: Mike
Location: Illinois
Aircraft Type: C140
Occupation-Interests:
Contact:

Re: Oil?

Post by 6930 »

David is correct.

I just listened to a seminar Mike Busch did on oil last week and Victory oil came up. He still favors Camguard. As I understand it, the LW-16702 is anti-scuffing only. Camguard is a corrosion inhibitor plus an anti wear and anti sludge compound.

Mike
Mike Pastore, N2635N
Naper Aero, LL10
User avatar
8233
Posts: 276
Joined: Wed May 02, 2018 6:52 pm
Name: David Freeland
Location: Kansas City
Aircraft Type: 1946 C120
Occupation-Interests: Program Management
Contact:

Re: Oil?

Post by 8233 »

6930 wrote: Fri Dec 18, 2020 3:28 pm David is correct.

I just listened to a seminar Mike Busch did on oil last week and Victory oil came up. He still favors Camguard. As I understand it, the LW-16702 is anti-scuffing only. Camguard is a corrosion inhibitor plus an anti wear and anti sludge compound.

Mike
Thanks Mike, I had forgotten about the seminar which I went back and listened to. He also talked about The Aeroshell W80/W100+ which he had talked Aeroshell into making some time back to put the additive package used in the Aeroshell 15W50 (anti wear and corrosion inhibitors) in the Straight weight oils . He then gets into Camguard and basically says it's a newer product and improvements were made so he likes it a bit better. Camguard has additional anti wear and anti corrosion inhibitors.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEGyN2U3FSM
David Freeland - CFII
1972 Bellanca Super Viking and 1946 Cessna 120
a64pilot
Posts: 319
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2020 8:41 pm
Name: Jody
Aircraft Type: C-140
Occupation-Interests: A&P former IA, Retired test pilot
Contact:

Re: Oil?

Post by a64pilot »

Why are you guys so hot on Camguard?
The cam wear issue is only Lycoming’s isn’t it? Plus where their cam is located makes it susceptible to corrosion, but our little TCM’s don’t have either issue?
In my opinion your better off running a high quality oil, straight weight for most of us and taking that camguard money and using it to buy more frequent oil changes.

Do any modern oils not contain the Lycoming additive now?

You want your engine to last longer? change it’s oil more frequently.

But then I say the same for oil analysis, take that money and spend it on more frequent oil changes too, and or take the money and fly more often.

It’s just human nature to want to find things that make our toys better, but often they aren’t required and or don’t do much.

To Certify an oil additive, you do NOT have to prove it’s of any use and or performs as claimed, you only have to prove to the FAA that it does no harm.

I wonder if Camguard is ZDDP? Which has been removed or at least greatly reduced in automotive oils as it poisons Catalysis, but old style flat tappet camshafts need it.

But here is the catch, IF Camguard is ZDDP, and if say Aeroshell has ZDDP in it, which I’d bet lunch money it has, ZDDP ideally needs to be between 1200 to 1400 PPM, higher levels than that will increase wear, not decrease it, so more is not better.
ZDDP has been around since WWII, was developed for aircraft engines and was in all oils until the EPA has required it to be removed as over time the phosphorus decreases the effectiveness of the catalytic convertor.

I find it hard to believe that a huge major company like let’s say Aeroshell hasn’t or won’t put an additive in their oil if it had even just a few of the magic qualities that cam guard claims,don’t you think that would sell a lot more oil if in fact they could advertise truthfully even just a few of the benefits Camguard claims?
a64pilot
Posts: 319
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2020 8:41 pm
Name: Jody
Aircraft Type: C-140
Occupation-Interests: A&P former IA, Retired test pilot
Contact:

Re: Oil?

Post by a64pilot »

Read this article
https://www.blackstone-labs.com/wp-cont ... -17-AC.pdf

Especially interesting to me was the last paragraph which was there of course as a sales pitch for oil analysis, what was interesting was the admission that the problem would have been found with an oil filter inspection, and that one hadn’t been done.

If your paying a Certified mechanic to change your oil and they don’t cut open and inspect the filter, you should not use them. Even our screens main purpose is to provide a means of inspection, sure it may catch the odd piece of carbon that falls off of the bottom of a piston, but it’s really there to catch broken pieces / parts so you will find them before the engine fails.
Post Reply