Ugly doubler install on fuselage after noseover
Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 8:26 pm
Hi all:
Casually looking at a C-140 project that was over on it's back at one time. Fuselage crinkled behind the rear spar as noted in photos. Doubler installed to reinforce the crinkle. It appears by 43.13 this doubler would be an approved repair (assuming done correctly and documented on a 337). My questions:
1. Does this repair look even remotely correctly done, and
2. Would (should) the fuselage have been put in a jig to ensure it was not twisted and/or bent in such a way as to alter the flight characteristics of the airplane.
I know it's impossible to "diagnose" any problems or repairs by photos, but would just like the opinions and thoughts of those much more competent than myself to evaluate this.
If it appears it might be OK, I will go take a look at the airframe in person and also review all the logs and paperwork.
Thanks!
Todd Littfin
Member 8024
1947 C-140 N4112N S/N 14025
Casually looking at a C-140 project that was over on it's back at one time. Fuselage crinkled behind the rear spar as noted in photos. Doubler installed to reinforce the crinkle. It appears by 43.13 this doubler would be an approved repair (assuming done correctly and documented on a 337). My questions:
1. Does this repair look even remotely correctly done, and
2. Would (should) the fuselage have been put in a jig to ensure it was not twisted and/or bent in such a way as to alter the flight characteristics of the airplane.
I know it's impossible to "diagnose" any problems or repairs by photos, but would just like the opinions and thoughts of those much more competent than myself to evaluate this.
If it appears it might be OK, I will go take a look at the airframe in person and also review all the logs and paperwork.
Thanks!
Todd Littfin
Member 8024
1947 C-140 N4112N S/N 14025