I've done a bit of research into this, from what I can tell using non-TSO'd equipment in certified aircraft is okay, as long as it's not a Transponder/ADSB, IFR related instruments or flight recorders. This means a standard comm radio would be okay. I've also seem people put in glass panels placarded with "Not Primary Flight Instrument." With something like a C120, it's hard to specify it has to be TSO'd if it never had it to begin with.
My current radio uses a bit of juice, and I was hoping to change it out with something like the GTR200 that uses less power and had a built in intercom.
The question I have here, when I replace the radio, can it be done with a simple logbook entry, or would it require a field approval? My thought is a logbook entry signed off by an A&P would be plenty.
Non-TSO'd Radio/Avionics
Forum rules
You must be a member of the Cessna 120-140 Association in order to post new topics, reply to existing topics, or search for information on this forum. Use the "Join" link in the red menu bar.
You must be a member of the Cessna 120-140 Association in order to post new topics, reply to existing topics, or search for information on this forum. Use the "Join" link in the red menu bar.
-
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 10:53 pm
- Name: Tamer A
- Location: KSNA
- Aircraft Type: 1946 C120 O-290-D
- Occupation-Interests: Engineer
- Contact:
- 5115
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 7:00 am
- Name: Martin Tanguay
- Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Aircraft Type: C140
- Occupation-Interests:
- Contact:
Re: Non-TSO'd Radio/Avionics
Hi Tamer,
This is a link I found a long time ago regarding TSO'd radios.
http://edburkhead.com/Ercoupe/radio_tso_requirement.htm
I'm not sure in the US if just a book entry is enough. But it will surely take also a W+B amendment.
This is a link I found a long time ago regarding TSO'd radios.
http://edburkhead.com/Ercoupe/radio_tso_requirement.htm
I'm not sure in the US if just a book entry is enough. But it will surely take also a W+B amendment.
Martin Tanguay
Intl Cessna 120-140 Association - Canadian rep
C140, C-FJAR, 1946, sn:9168, O-200, ragwings
Intl Cessna 120-140 Association - Canadian rep
C140, C-FJAR, 1946, sn:9168, O-200, ragwings
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2018 10:48 pm
- Name: Christopher B
- Location: Merrill Field, Alaska
- Aircraft Type: C120
- Occupation-Interests: USAF
- Contact:
Re: Non-TSO'd Radio/Avionics
I replaced a KX-170B (non-TSO) with a Garmin GTR 200. A&P/IA did a logbook entry.
By the way, awesome radio.
Good luck,
Chris
By the way, awesome radio.
Good luck,
Chris
-
- Posts: 600
- Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 7:00 am
- Name: Mac Forbes
- Location: North Carolina
- Aircraft Type: '46 Cessna 140
- Occupation-Interests: Retired - Current 120-140 Assoc. NC Rep.
- Contact:
Re: Non-TSO'd Radio/Avionics
FWIW, in looking back at my 140's "radio history", there's been a 337 for each new replacement. It had a Narco Escort 110 when I bought it (...would transmit almost as far as a good garage door opener on its limited freqs, incidentally ). The next upgrade was to a non-TSO'd Terra 960 & included completion of a #337 + new W & B. Good radio...on my golf cart & working OK today. In '02 we replaced the Terra with a non TSOd Icom A-200 -- the IA installed that, again with #337 completed + W & B updated. I do recall that the IA asked his FSDO contact about installing the non-TSOd vs. the exact same that was TSOd and available. He was asked for his opinion on the difference 'twixt the TSOd unit and the non & he replied "about $100 bucks"...the FAA rep laughed & said to just install it, complete/submit the 337 and get on with life. Again, FWIW, as this was "way back" in '02. Mac
-
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 10:53 pm
- Name: Tamer A
- Location: KSNA
- Aircraft Type: 1946 C120 O-290-D
- Occupation-Interests: Engineer
- Contact:
Re: Non-TSO'd Radio/Avionics
Thanks for the feedback guys, and for that link Martin.
I have an A&P I've been working with who is pretty friendly. I'll run this idea by him and see what he says. I think it should be okay.
Glad to hear you love your GTR Chris.
I have an A&P I've been working with who is pretty friendly. I'll run this idea by him and see what he says. I think it should be okay.
Glad to hear you love your GTR Chris.