CHT's newly overhauled engine 0-200

Ask Questions and Offer Advice Related to the Cessna 120 & 140 Type
Forum rules
You must be a member of the Cessna 120-140 Association in order to post new topics, reply to existing topics, or search for information on this forum. Use the "Join" link in the red menu bar.
Post Reply
User avatar
6597
Posts: 374
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 7:00 am
Name: David Sbur
Location: Vancouver WA KVUO
Aircraft Type: '46 140 0-200A
Occupation-Interests: Agriculture
Contact:

CHT's newly overhauled engine 0-200

Post by 6597 »

Is there a rule of thumb as to when I can start seeing CHT's drop some after an overhaul?

Currently ambient temps in the 60's, climb out CHT's 400+, drops to 375 after about 10 minutes cruise, and after about 20-30 minutes I'm down to 345-350. Oil temps a steady 180.

14 hours on the tach at the moment, burned about a quart and a half so far (steel Millenium cylinders).

Aeroshell 80 (40wt) straight mineral. We'll go to straight weight Aeroshell W100 at 25 hours.

I did do an initial oil change at 2 hours, boy that stuff looked pretty awful....

Traditionally pre-overhaul I had a hard time keeping the engine warm, CHT's in cruise were usually 275 or less.
User avatar
TheFlyingMechanic
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri May 06, 2022 9:40 am
Name: Mac
Location: Middle TN
Aircraft Type: C-140
Occupation-Interests: Mechanic, IA, CFI, CFII, MEI, ASES, MTSU Faculty Member, Taco lover.
Contact:

Re: CHT's newly overhauled engine 0-200

Post by TheFlyingMechanic »

What was your power settings? We normally have 25 hours on a new overhaul easy... 3-5 on just a cylinder...

I know that this is Lycoming but it might help give you some answers...

https://www.lycoming.com/sites/default/ ... mption.pdf
Collin Mac
User avatar
6597
Posts: 374
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 7:00 am
Name: David Sbur
Location: Vancouver WA KVUO
Aircraft Type: '46 140 0-200A
Occupation-Interests: Agriculture
Contact:

Re: CHT's newly overhauled engine 0-200

Post by 6597 »

I usually run between 2200 and 2450 in cruise for now, normally 2450.

I've checked the baffles a dozen times, they are old but tight (I'm currently patterning new ones).

It just may be a combination of new cylinders, overhauled carb and overhauled mags that are contributing and making the previous old tired engine look it's age.

I know my static rpm jumped from about 2300 pre-overhaul to 2450, I had to adjust the linkage to drop it back a little. Hate leaving power on the table, maybe a re-pitch will be in the future.

16.5 on the tach now, the oil consumption is definitely settling down now.

We'll see where the temps are when the tach hits 25.
User avatar
6643
Posts: 2444
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 7:00 am
Name: John C
Location: KLCI, NH
Aircraft Type: 1946 C140/C90
Occupation-Interests: A&P, semi-retired
Contact:

Re: CHT's newly overhauled engine 0-200

Post by 6643 »

6597 wrote: Wed Jun 01, 2022 9:31 pm I had to adjust the linkage to drop it back a little.
I don't understand what you're saying, unless you mean you limited the throttle to less than full open, in which case, well. static RPM is measured at full throttle...

When was the last time your tach was checked?
User avatar
6597
Posts: 374
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 7:00 am
Name: David Sbur
Location: Vancouver WA KVUO
Aircraft Type: '46 140 0-200A
Occupation-Interests: Agriculture
Contact:

Re: CHT's newly overhauled engine 0-200

Post by 6597 »

John,

Yes, I limited my throttle 'throw' by adjusting the connection, you are absolutely correct. I don't like it but other than re-pitching the prop it's the only option I have in the short term. Regardless, I think my 'new' engine has more ponies than the old one.
NewThrottleLinkage.jpg
NewThrottleLinkage.jpg (48.25 KiB) Viewed 1316 times
As far as checking the tach my ancient HeathKit analog handheld tach says all is correct, however my A&P friend has a more modern unit that I will check with.
s-l640.jpg
s-l640.jpg (26.97 KiB) Viewed 1316 times

Here is the 337 response I have from Witchita regarding the particular prop I have, it's a 71/42 on the 0-200. My best guess is when an ancient owner decided to re-engine to the 0-200 he didn't want to shell out money for a new prop on the STC so he 337'd the McCauley he had. I can't complain on the performance but I do need to watch the overspeed when transitioning to cruise. The plane climbs like a rocket, 1100-1200fpm with me and full fuel at sea level where I'm at. Cruise is still at 2450-ish and 105mph indicated so I don't think I gave up much at all in cruise.
img220.jpg
img220.jpg (122.43 KiB) Viewed 1316 times
I think Randy has done his homework extremely well and his prop requirements and advice would be much more appropriate for the 0-200. This just happens to be what I've inherited and I've learned to live and work with it.
Post Reply