Tailwheel bracket attachment methods - legality

Ask Questions and Offer Advice Related to the Cessna 120 & 140 Type
Forum rules
You must be a member of the Cessna 120-140 Association in order to post new topics, reply to existing topics, or search for information on this forum. Use the "Join" link in the red menu bar.
Post Reply
8451
Posts: 83
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2019 1:20 am
Name: Daniel
Aircraft Type: Formerly a 120
Occupation-Interests:
Contact:

Tailwheel bracket attachment methods - legality

Post by 8451 »

To avoid hijacking the other thread about brackets I’d like some input on the practice of substituting bolts for rivets. I’m well aware the view here is that rivets are preferred. Doing some research on the matter I found the following in the Cessna 100 Series Manual:
19-52A. REPLACEMENT OF HI-SHEAR RIVETS with close-tolerance bolts or other commercial fasteners of equivalent strength properties is permissible. Holes should not be elongated and the Hi-shear substitute should be a smooth push fit. Forging may be spot-faced the least amount necessary for proper seating of the fasteners.
Without getting into the weeds of rivets vs. bolts (covered well in the other thread), does this paragraph constitute manufacturer’s guidance authorizing the substitution?

This is more an academic question than anything. I’m wondering if all those aircraft flying with bolts are legally airworthy.
User avatar
6643
Posts: 2477
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 7:00 am
Name: John C
Location: KLCI, NH
Aircraft Type: 1946 C140/C90
Occupation-Interests: A&P, semi-retired
Contact:

Re: Tailwheel bracket attachment methods - legality

Post by 6643 »

8451 wrote: Mon Aug 26, 2019 7:34 am
19-52A. REPLACEMENT OF HI-SHEAR RIVETS with close-tolerance bolts or other commercial fasteners of equivalent strength properties is permissible. Holes should not be elongated and the Hi-shear substitute should be a smooth push fit. Forging may be spot-faced the least amount necessary for proper seating of the fasteners.
does this paragraph constitute manufacturer’s guidance authorizing the substitution?
Good question. I'm going to say it provides guidance, but not authorization. First off, to the best of my knowledge, the 100 series maintenance manual is not FAA approved, so, at best, it is acceptable data, not approved data, so you'd still need a field approval. Secondly, the paragraph above is quite specific in that it calls for close tolerance bolts or equivalent, and "push fit", (a light interference fit) which means you have to ream the holes to size. By the time you get done doing that you could have riveted it on a half a dozen times... I also suspect the cost of that many close tolerance bolts would make your head spin.
8424
Posts: 217
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2019 11:43 am
Name: Steve A H
Location: OK74
Aircraft Type: 1950 C140A
Occupation-Interests: Retired
Contact:

Re: Tailwheel bracket attachment methods - legality

Post by 8424 »

"By the time you get done doing that you could have riveted it on a half a dozen times..."

For most owners it probably would be "You will be paying your AP/IA who could have riveted it on a half dozen times..."!

That may make the close tolerance bolts a little less expensive! ( Sorry AP/IA's, I'm having a little fun at your expense!)

Close tolerance bolts ARE expensive. I just bought some NAS spar bolts for an RV-4.

Steve H
User avatar
6643
Posts: 2477
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 7:00 am
Name: John C
Location: KLCI, NH
Aircraft Type: 1946 C140/C90
Occupation-Interests: A&P, semi-retired
Contact:

Re: Tailwheel bracket attachment methods - legality

Post by 6643 »

Steve, I think I may have confused you. If you're paying your A&P to rivet it on, he can do it in 1/6the the time it would take to ream all those holes (to match) so he can install those clo$e tolerance bolt$.
8424
Posts: 217
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2019 11:43 am
Name: Steve A H
Location: OK74
Aircraft Type: 1950 C140A
Occupation-Interests: Retired
Contact:

Re: Tailwheel bracket attachment methods - legality

Post by 8424 »

John, I was just giving you AP guys a little razzing! A few rivets and a 1/2 hour's worth of riveting time will be WAY cheaper (and easier) than all the work required for and the expense of close tolerance bolts.

If it weren't for AP/IAs, us owners would be in a world of trouble!

Everybody have a good weekend.

Steve H
Post Reply