C85 Magneto choice

Ask Questions and Offer Advice Related to the Cessna 120 & 140 Type
Forum rules
You must be a member of the Cessna 120-140 Association in order to post new topics, reply to existing topics, or search for information on this forum. Use the "Join" link in the red menu bar.
7698
Posts: 70
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 7:00 am
Name: TailWheelCharlie
Location: UK
Aircraft Type: C120 - GAKVM
Occupation-Interests:
Contact:

C85 Magneto choice

Post by 7698 »

Having had my right Eisemann magneto fail for the second time I'm just about to purchase a set of replacement items...

Ive looked at the Slick upgrade kit K4520-40, but also considered buying refurbished Bendix 10-500514-1R...

With no experience of either Im looking for some guidance... One overhaul shop in UK suggested Bendix over Slick, so interested in experieinced thoughts.
6298
Posts: 247
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 7:00 am
Name: Randy Thompson
Location: California
Aircraft Type: Cessna 140
Occupation-Interests: Work on airplanes and engines
Contact:

Re: C85 Magneto choice

Post by 6298 »

I have used, and liked, the Slicks for years. The Bendix are very good, too. Eisemann are pretty much obsolete!
Randy Thompson A&P IA Pilot
Hold STC SA547EA for installation of O-200 engine in Cessna 120/140 and 140A"s
Overhaul small Continentals
User avatar
6643
Posts: 2482
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 7:00 am
Name: John C
Location: KLCI, NH
Aircraft Type: 1946 C140/C90
Occupation-Interests: A&P, semi-retired
Contact:

Re: C85 Magneto choice

Post by 6643 »

Either Slick or Bendix will do the job. The price on the Slicks used to be a factor, but now I think there's not much difference between the two. The Slicks have more throw-away parts but the parts tend to be cheaper, so it's really a wash there, too.
7698
Posts: 70
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 7:00 am
Name: TailWheelCharlie
Location: UK
Aircraft Type: C120 - GAKVM
Occupation-Interests:
Contact:

Re: C85 Magneto choice

Post by 7698 »

Thanks guys, useful information.
2066
Posts: 600
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 7:00 am
Name: Mac Forbes
Location: North Carolina
Aircraft Type: '46 Cessna 140
Occupation-Interests: Retired - Current 120-140 Assoc. NC Rep.
Contact:

Re: C85 Magneto choice

Post by 2066 »

IIRC, you'll need new/serviceable gears for the update... Just something to factor in the budget.
7698
Posts: 70
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 7:00 am
Name: TailWheelCharlie
Location: UK
Aircraft Type: C120 - GAKVM
Occupation-Interests:
Contact:

Re: C85 Magneto choice

Post by 7698 »

2066 wrote: Fri May 01, 2020 12:51 pm IIRC, you'll need new/serviceable gears for the update... Just something to factor in the budget.
Good point... Luckily, having only recently carried out a major overhaul on the bottom end I've had the gears inspected and NDTd and all good. Should probably replaced the Eisemanns at the same time..
2066
Posts: 600
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 7:00 am
Name: Mac Forbes
Location: North Carolina
Aircraft Type: '46 Cessna 140
Occupation-Interests: Retired - Current 120-140 Assoc. NC Rep.
Contact:

Re: C85 Magneto choice

Post by 2066 »

7698 wrote: Fri May 01, 2020 1:47 pm
2066 wrote: Fri May 01, 2020 12:51 pm IIRC, you'll need new/serviceable gears for the update... Just something to factor in the budget.
Good point... Luckily, having only recently carried out a major overhaul on the bottom end I've had the gears inspected and NDTd and all good. Should probably replaced the Eisemanns at the same time..
That's great...we are talking about the mag drive gears that are attached to the mags. Best I recall the gears on the Eisemanns will not fit on the new mags(?). Mac
7698
Posts: 70
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 7:00 am
Name: TailWheelCharlie
Location: UK
Aircraft Type: C120 - GAKVM
Occupation-Interests:
Contact:

Re: C85 Magneto choice

Post by 7698 »

2066 wrote: Fri May 01, 2020 2:34 pm
7698 wrote: Fri May 01, 2020 1:47 pm
2066 wrote: Fri May 01, 2020 12:51 pm IIRC, you'll need new/serviceable gears for the update... Just something to factor in the budget.
Good point... Luckily, having only recently carried out a major overhaul on the bottom end I've had the gears inspected and NDTd and all good. Should probably replaced the Eisemanns at the same time..
That's great...we are talking about the mag drive gears that are attached to the mags. Best I recall the gears on the Eisemanns will not fit on the new mags(?). Mac
Understand.. I was referring to the mag gears... Part no 36067. They look to be the same fitting style for Slick Impulse?
7981
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 7:00 am
Name: Jigger 87
Location: Seattle/Tacoma
Aircraft Type: C-120
Occupation-Interests: A&P /IA retired
Contact:

Re: C85 Magneto choice

Post by 7981 »

Just swapped out my Eisemann's for TCM with harness. Slick's are OK. I have always had better service from TCM/Bendix. Don't forget spark plugs and "P" lead inspection to finish out the installation.
2066
Posts: 600
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 7:00 am
Name: Mac Forbes
Location: North Carolina
Aircraft Type: '46 Cessna 140
Occupation-Interests: Retired - Current 120-140 Assoc. NC Rep.
Contact:

Re: C85 Magneto choice

Post by 2066 »

7698 wrote: Fri May 01, 2020 4:02 pm
2066 wrote: Fri May 01, 2020 2:34 pm
7698 wrote: Fri May 01, 2020 1:47 pm

Good point... Luckily, having only recently carried out a major overhaul on the bottom end I've had the gears inspected and NDTd and all good. Should probably replaced the Eisemanns at the same time..
That's great...we are talking about the mag drive gears that are attached to the mags. Best I recall the gears on the Eisemanns will not fit on the new mags(?). Mac
Understand.. I was referring to the mag gears... Part no 36067. They look to be the same fitting style for Slick Impulse?
Hope so. We recently changed out the Eisemanns on Tom Reddeck's 140 (C85) and the drive gears had to be changed, too, as the Eisemanns would not fit. Maybe yours are a different model. Mac
Post Reply