Extended luggage compartment
Forum rules
You must be a member of the Cessna 120-140 Association in order to post new topics, reply to existing topics, or search for information on this forum. Use the "Join" link in the red menu bar.
You must be a member of the Cessna 120-140 Association in order to post new topics, reply to existing topics, or search for information on this forum. Use the "Join" link in the red menu bar.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:37 pm
- Name:
- Aircraft Type:
- Occupation-Interests:
- Contact:
Re: Extended luggage compartment
The battery box seems to be in the stock location. I pulled the aft floor board and bulkhead panels today. Seems they hauled some fuel/ camp oil that leaked into the tail cone. Probably 30 years ago. Dark, sticky oil residue. Fun times to clean up. The plane was used for winter ice fishing trips on skis. What do you think to clean that?
-
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 10:53 pm
- Name: Tamer A
- Location: KSNA
- Aircraft Type: 1946 C120 O-290-D
- Occupation-Interests: Engineer
- Contact:
Re: Extended luggage compartment
Thanks for posting! Hard to tell from the photo, any of the control cables relocated?
- 6643
- Posts: 2444
- Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 7:00 am
- Name: John C
- Location: KLCI, NH
- Aircraft Type: 1946 C140/C90
- Occupation-Interests: A&P, semi-retired
- Contact:
Re: Extended luggage compartment
The arm for the aux fuel is 23.5, so, I'm guessing it is in the wings. Probably another 337...
The computation probably doesn't include a passenger because they are going for most rearward CG at gross, and the baggage compartment arm is more aft, so, putting the 33 lbs in the back has more effect on the CG than a 33 lb passenger would...
A more critical computation would be less fuel and more weight in the baggage compartment.
The computation probably doesn't include a passenger because they are going for most rearward CG at gross, and the baggage compartment arm is more aft, so, putting the 33 lbs in the back has more effect on the CG than a 33 lb passenger would...
A more critical computation would be less fuel and more weight in the baggage compartment.
John Cooper
www.skyportservices.net
www.skyportservices.net
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2020 1:02 pm
- Name: Roger
- Location: So. Oregon
- Aircraft Type: 140
- Occupation-Interests: Scratch head....tired or retired right now.
- Contact:
Re: Extended luggage compartment
Thanks John, I totally missed that tank location. Now it makes sense at 90 lbs, especially if it's another 140 tank inline. 75 lb fuel, 15 lbs hardware/tank.
Wasn't that what the 48' C-170 ragwing used, 3 Cessna 140 tanks?
Boy, this airplane has some neat modications!! Anything else you might like to share that will bring a smile to our faces? Enjoy your new ride!!
Wasn't that what the 48' C-170 ragwing used, 3 Cessna 140 tanks?
Boy, this airplane has some neat modications!! Anything else you might like to share that will bring a smile to our faces? Enjoy your new ride!!
-
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2020 11:28 pm
- Name:
- Aircraft Type:
- Occupation-Interests:
- Contact:
Re: Extended luggage compartment
I sent pictures of that metal track. I was incorrect before. It is actually an L. I’m not sure what gauge metal, but it is very thin. The radius is quite wide on it as well, probably a quarter inch